[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can guile be implementation independent?
From: |
Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Can guile be implementation independent? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:26:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 |
>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021, 09:43 Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>>> Is there a way to do the same on GNU Guile? Like writing a code
>>> that can
>>> be interpreted by implementations that are following the IEEE
>>> 1178-2008
>>> or R7RS standard?
>> On 12/17/21 03:53, Nala Ginrut wrote:
>>> Hi Jacob!
>>> You may take a look at akku.scm
>>> You can write r7rs code and use Guile as one of the compiler alternatives.
>> On 17 Dec 2021, at 03:01, Jacob Hrbek <kreyren@rixotstudio.cz> wrote:
>> Looks interesting, are there any known limitations in relation to Guile?
silas poulson <silas8642@hotmail.co.uk> writes:
> Uncertain if anymore but Guile provides list of r7rs incompatiblities
> here
> <https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/R7RS-Incompatibilities.html>
The short of this: Call guile with --r7rs and the main incompatibility
is missing reading of circular data structures with datum labels.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Can guile be implementation independent?, Maxime Devos, 2021/12/17
Re: [EXT] Can guile be implementation independent?, Thompson, David, 2021/12/17