[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weird import behaviour of digital modules
|
From: |
lloda |
|
Subject: |
Re: Weird import behaviour of digital modules |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Jun 2024 23:15:53 +0200 |
> On 8 Jun 2024, at 19:30, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> wrote:
>
> On 2024-06-08 15:59:12 +0200, lloda wrote:
>> Modules can't have numbers as names in general
>
> Modules most definitely *can* have numbers as names, my Advent of Code
> solutions
> are stored in files matching $YEAR/$DAY pattern (e.g. 2023/01.scm) and it
> works
> just fine, both define-module and use-modules.
i stand corrected. But then why isn't srfi/n a symlink to srfi/srfi-n instead
of the way it's done that only works with import?
regards
daniel