[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming scheme for Python packages
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Naming scheme for Python packages |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2013 23:16:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:52:08PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> (define pytz
> (package
> (name "python-pytz")
> ...))
> This is quite Debianish. I like it.
But the alternative (as I suggested in the packaging guidelines) is as
debianish:
> (define python-pytz
> (package
> (name "python-pytz")
> ...))
We agree on the outer experience, the question is now how to name variables
internally (which is, admittedly, less important).
Andreas
- Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Cyril Roelandt, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Cyril Roelandt, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/05
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/06
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/07
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/07
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/08
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/08