[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming scheme for Python packages
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Naming scheme for Python packages |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2013 23:32:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Apparently, I am getting tired. Especially the variable names must be
distinct: There is python-pytz (as a module for python=python-3) and
python2-pytz (as a module for python-2) inside the same scheme module.
Unless we wish to create scheme modules python2 and python3, which
I find rather awkward. And if we end up using renamers, it all boils
down to the same thing again.
Andreas
- Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Cyril Roelandt, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Cyril Roelandt, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/04
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/05
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/06
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/07
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/07
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/08
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Andreas Enge, 2013/09/08
- Re: Naming scheme for Python packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/08