[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 23:10:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130007 (Ma Gnus v0.7) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:21:14PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Assuming the format is stable, we could just use the current glib.
>
> This is probably the only viable approach. It feels less functional than
> one would like: The user profile then depends not only on the installed
> packages, but also (potentially) on the current glib version. Close to a
> side effect, I would say.
I don’t think this matches the definition of a side effect. ;-)
But yes, that means you possibly end up pulling an extra package just to
build the profile.
It’s actually already the case: the profile is built by running
‘guile-final’, so when you don’t have it in the store, it gets built
just to be able to build the profile (unless you passed --bootstrap).
Ludo’.
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, (continued)
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Aljosha Papsch, 2013/10/09
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/10
- LXDE, was: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/10
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/10
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/07
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/07
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/02
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/07
Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Cyril Roelandt, 2013/10/02