[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Oct 2013 21:48:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:10:54PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I don’t think this matches the definition of a side effect. ;-)
Indeed, no, it it more the other way round: The environment has an impact
on the function value. Concretely, the user environment would depend
not only on the packages that are installed, but also on the glib
version that is current at the moment of installation. While this glib
can be seen as an additional input, so functionality is not disturbed,
I still think it is not really desirable, and I would prefer a solution
"local" to each packet. But here, I do not see any.
Andreas
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, (continued)
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/10
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/07
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/07
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/02
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Andreas Enge, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/10/03
- Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome,
Andreas Enge <=
Re: Brasero, or gnome without gnome, Cyril Roelandt, 2013/10/02