[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch
From: |
Nikita Karetnikov |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:37:15 +0400 |
>> Is there a function that accepts a package name and returns a list of
>> implicit inputs?
> No, because by definition, those “implicit inputs” are not listed in the
> package object. Instead, they are added by the build system (see
> build-system/gnu.scm.)
> That’s why I suggested using derivations instead: take the output of
> (package-derivation x y), and traverse it in search of fixed-output
> derivations.
What’s a fixed-ouput derivation?
pgpgq6TTGxeXM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/01
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/02
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch,
Nikita Karetnikov <=
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/03
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/09
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/10
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/12
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/12
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/24
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/25
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/25