[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch
From: |
Nikita Karetnikov |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 01:20:21 +0400 |
I’m attaching the patch. Several issues must be addressed before it can
be pushed:
1. ‘guix prefetch’ tries to configure and build some packages instead of
just downloading them. I tried the following on a machine with the
empty store:
a. Ran ‘guix prefetch hello’. Some packages were downloaded and
built (I gathered those are needed to download the other packages,
so I didn’t write down the names. If I recall correctly, Guile
was in that list.)
b. Invoked ‘guix build hello’ without network access. The command
succeeded. No questions here.
c. Called ‘guix prefetch emacs’. These packages were configured and
built: pkg-config, libunistring, ncurses, libatomic_ops, patch,
tar, xz, gzip, zlib, which, gc, perl, m4, readline, libffi,
texinfo, libtool, gmp, libtasn1, nettle, guile, gnutls.
Are these essential, or is there an error in ‘guix prefetch’?
According to the build logs, the install prefix of gmp is
‘/gnu/store/hpaz49xz76p4qmpjc9r33hni1w781y66-gmp-5.1.3’, which
doesn’t appear in the lists provided by ‘guix prefetch hello’ and
‘guix prefetch emacs’. I’m not sure why it’s the case.
2. I think it would be nice to output the location of a tarball after
running ‘guix prefetch’, but I’m not sure how to get the relevant
derivation. For ‘hello’, it’s neither
(package-source-derivation store (package-source hello))
nor
(package-derivation store hello)
because the derivation listed in the initial output of ‘guix prefetch
hello’ differs. Of course, it’s possible to filter the list
produced by
(build-derivations
store
(map (lambda (drv)
;; (format #t " ~a~%" (derivation-file-name drv))
(format #t " ~a~%" drv)
drv)
(derivations-to-prefetch
store
(package-derivation store package)))))
But it’s error-prone, so I’d rather avoid that.
3. I’m planning to add ‘--dry-run’, which will simply print the list of
needed derivations. What options would you like to see implemented?
prefetch.patch.4
Description: Text document
pgpPROBSD5aXm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/01
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/02
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/02
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/03
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/09
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/10
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Nikita Karetnikov, 2014/04/12
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/12
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch,
Nikita Karetnikov <=
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/25
- Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/04/25