[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: Howto run guix.el correctly? |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:38:05 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ludovic Courtès (2014-11-26 19:23 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> As I wrote at
>> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-08/msg00165.html>, I
>> see the only way to achieve that:
>>
>> - to modify emacs package recipes so that they will provide some files
>> with all required initial configuration (and to name such file
>> "…-autoloads.el", for example);
>
> ‘FOO-autoloads.el’ is the most common convention, right?
I think there is no any convention on this, but emacs package system
generates “foo-autoloads.el” indeed.
>> - to modify “guix-init.el” so that (require 'guix-init) will load those
>> autoloads files;
>>
>> - to write some elisp code for auto-loading "…-autoloads.el" on the fly
>> — i.e., to make it possible to install an Emacs package using
>> "guix.el" and to use "M-x <package-command>" immediately.
>
> Yep, that sounds good.
>
>> So if it's acceptable, what about modifying the current recipes
>> step-by-step. With geiser it's easy: as "geiser-install.el" provides
>> all required setup (including autoloads for "M-x …" commands),
>> "geiser-autoloads.el" may just be a symlink to "geiser-install.el". I'm
>> attaching the patch for that.
>
> Yes.
>
>> + (arguments
>> + '(#:phases (alist-cons-after
>> + 'install 'post-install
>> + (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (symlink "geiser-install.el"
>> + (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out")
>> + "/share/emacs/site-lisp/"
>> + "geiser-autoloads.el")))
>> + %standard-phases)))
>
> This particular instance won’t work because it’s called from
> $top_builddir.
Sorry I didn't understand why it wouldn't work. I tried it and it worked
as I expected: a proper "geiser-autoloads.el" symlink was created.
> Actually, since it’s going to be used in most packages, what about
> adding an ‘install-autoloads’ procedure in (guix build emacs-utils)?
> So the above would become
>
> (alist-cons-after
> 'install 'post-install
> (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
> (install-autoloads (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
> %standard-phases)
OK.
> Or better yet, (guix build emacs-utils) could provide
> %standard-emacs-phases.
>
> WDYT?
The problem is that I don't understand what these %standard-emacs-phases
should be, that's why I wanted to do it step-by-step. I don't see
general patterns right now. Some packages would require just making a
link as with geiser, other packages require generating autoloads and
maybe some others require additional steps. What about making
"wip-emacs-packages" branch and to put the appropriate changes there for
now?
--
Alex
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, (continued)
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Alex Kost, 2014/11/22
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Adam Pribyl, 2014/11/22
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, David Thompson, 2014/11/22
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/22
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Alex Kost, 2014/11/23
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/24
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Alex Kost, 2014/11/25
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/26
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?,
Alex Kost <=
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/26
- Re: Howto run guix.el correctly?, Alex Kost, 2014/11/26