Re: Preliminary 'wip-armhf' branch pushed

[John Darrington]

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 02:23:30PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
     
     John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
     > It would seem then, that the only difference between the wip-arm and
     > the wip-armhf branches is the value of the --with-fpu flag.
     
     That is not even close to the truth, as anyone who actually looks at the
     branches (or tries to build them) can easily see.  John, I appreciate
     your preliminary work on 'wip-arm', and I credited you in the final
     patch on 'wip-armhf', but you didn't get very far.

No I didn't.   I didn't think it worth even creating a branch, but civodul 
asked me to.
So I was surprised and disappointed that nobody wanted to help take it further.

You said your branch also wasn't ready, that's why I haven't tried to build it.
From your description, I wasn't clear what your branch achieves that my attempt
doesn't.
     
J'


-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature