[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font. |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jan 2015 17:28:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-01-16 23:37 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Ian Denhardt <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> Latest word on the Symbola font from the FSF:
>>
>> Thanks Ian for the update.
>>
>> I forgot the details, but IIRC Alex Kost was the initial submitter.
>> What can be done here?
>
> Yes it was me, so if I understand correctly, Symbola font should not
> appear in the distribution (because of the license problem), right?
Does the license problem applies to all the files or just some?
If it makes sense, we could simply remove the offending files.
Ludo’.
- Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ian Denhardt, 2015/01/14
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/16
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Alex Kost, 2015/01/17
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font.,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Alex Kost, 2015/01/18
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/18
- Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Jason Self, 2015/01/18
- Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., John Darrington, 2015/01/18
- Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Alex Kost, 2015/01/19