[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font.
From: |
Alex Kost |
Subject: |
Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font. |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:39:18 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington (2015-01-18 18:58 +0300) wrote:
[...]
> It could become a real issue, if, say, the author dies, his hiers then decide
> to
> make it into a proprietary software.
>
> I think Guix is right to take the cautious approach.
>
> (What actually depends on these fonts? There are oodles of fonts today. Can
> it
> be substituted by something else?)
Nothing depends on Symbola font, so it may be safely ignored. I just
use it all the time, so I proposed this package several months ago.
--
Alex
- Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ian Denhardt, 2015/01/14
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/16
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Alex Kost, 2015/01/17
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/17
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Alex Kost, 2015/01/18
- Re: Fwd: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/18
- Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., Jason Self, 2015/01/18
- Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font., John Darrington, 2015/01/18
- Re: [gnu.org #954922] Vague "licensing" for the symbola font.,
Alex Kost <=