[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu: Add CLISP.
From: |
Eric Bavier |
Subject: |
Re: gnu: Add CLISP. |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2015 07:26:35 -0600 |
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:44 -0500
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
> Eric Bavier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100
> > address@hidden (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer) wrote:
> >
> >> From 6201470b3e6c2410be7f38d8cc1cc99c3b13f0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
> >> <address@hidden>
> >> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:19:52 +0100
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add CLISP.
>
> I agree with all of Eric's feedback, with one exception:
>
> >> + (description "GNU CLISP is an implementation of ANSI Common
> >> Lisp, with +many extensions. It includes an interpreter, compiler,
> > ^
> > "+many" -> "many"
> [...]
> > Copy and paste + wrapping errors? ;)
>
> This seems to be a problem on your end, Eric. I guess that your mail
> client word-wrapped Taylan's patch. The '+'s you see intermixed were at
> the beginning of each line of the patch, of course.
Indeed, this was my error (using an unfamiliar email client). My
apologies for the noise.
>
> >> + ;; Website says gpl2+, COPYRIGHT file says gpl2; actual source
> >> files have
> >> + ;; a lot of gpl3+. (Also some parts are under non-copyleft
> >> licenses, such
> >> + ;; as CLX by Texas Instruments.)
> >> + (license (list license:gpl2 license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+))))
> >
> > I think in this case the gpl3+ might "win out", but I'll let others
> > comment on that.
>
> Yes, I think that's correct.
Thanks for the confirmation.
`~Eric