[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: mutter: Update to HEAD.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/7] gnu: mutter: Update to HEAD. |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2017 17:52:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi David,
David Craven <address@hidden> skribis:
> * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (mutter): Update to HEAD.
> [native-inputs]: Add autoconf, automake and libtool.
> [arguments]: Add autoreconf phase.
> ---
> gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> index f6f7aae69..5fbd0c111 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> @@ -4203,17 +4203,20 @@ to display dialog boxes from the commandline and
> shell scripts.")
> (license license:lgpl2.0+)))
>
> (define-public mutter
> + ;; Bugfixes!
> + (let ((commit "23c315ea7121e9bd108e2837d0b4beeba53c5e18"))
Could you be more specific? :-)
I think relying on unreleased software is fine when that is known to fix
security issues. In other cases, we should stick to upstream releases
IMO: it’s upstream’s job to decide when a commit can be considered a
release.
Ludo’.
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] gnu: Enable CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI., (continued)