[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’! |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:39:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> Looks like there’s been a disk space issue a few days ago that’s now
>> solved, so I’ve restarted an evaluation of the “core” subset.
>>
>> Is there any blocker left or should we move forward after that?
>
> We were waiting for the xorg-server 1.19.3 hotfix that was announced a
> few days ago [0], but it hasn't been released yet.
>
> I suggest we either run "autoreconf" in the build process of 1.19.2, or
> graft 1.19.3 when available. Any preference?
>
> [0] https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2017-March/002780.html
It’s been 3 days since their message and it hasn’t happened yet, so
perhaps we should simply run autoreconf.
Thoughts?
BTW, xorg-server is a build-time dependency of address@hidden (for test
purposes), which is the main reason why it has so many dependents.
Perhaps it would be fine to keep using 1.9.12 for GTK+. That way, we
can update xorg-server without rebuilding the world.
Ludo’.
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/06
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Marius Bakke, 2017/03/06
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/06
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/07
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/08
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/08
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/08
Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/06