[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’! |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:13:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) |
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:54:06PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Another option is to keep version 2.6.2 around, which is better than a
> specialized "flex-for-grub". If the previous version works for both grub
> and wireshark, I prefer this alternative.
The choices are a bit overwhelming; there are problems with 2.6.2 as
well:
https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/134 (kservice broken)
https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/113 (doxygen broken)
https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/98 (flex tests fail)
2.6.4 is "due" today, although I'm not sure what changes could be
included:
https://github.com/westes/flex/milestones
We should not go back to anything before 2.6.1, due to CVE-2016-6354:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-6354
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, (continued)
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Marius Bakke, 2017/03/06
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/06
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/06
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/07
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/08
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/08
- Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/08
Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/06