[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Services can now have a default value
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Services can now have a default value |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:59:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Christopher Allan Webber writes:
> A record interface with inheritance! Neat.
I need to look at that...although ;-P
> Though hey, if you're going to add inheritance, we also have GOOPS, and
> with the clone macro I sent to the mailing list a while ago that I
> worked on with Janneke, we even have immutable GOOPS! ;)
> Plus then you get generic methods!
+1
> - Chris Webber, who may only be slightly trolling and knows Guix will
> probably never adopt using GOOPS
:-D
Greetings,
--janneke who'd like to see a lightweight functional GOOPS more
prominently used
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
- Re: Services can now have a default value, (continued)
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/19
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/21
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/21
- We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/21
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22