[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value]
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value] |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Apr 2017 09:12:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> I want an formal, publicly tracked (not *just* on the mailinglist) RFC (like
> in Rust or similar projects) procedure for all things which
> can break currently existing configurations. Introducing these changes would
> require to document properly what needs to changed so that people can read
> about how to fix the mistakes.
[…]
API changes are usually explained in the release announcement’s
changelog. This doesn’t really help between releases, though. So,
either we release more often (yay!) or we support the old APIs until the
next release (boo!).
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
- Re: Services can now have a default value, (continued)
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/17
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/19
- Re: Services can now have a default value, ng0, 2017/04/19
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/19
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/19
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/20
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/21
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/04/21
- We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/21
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value],
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/04/23
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/23
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/27
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], Petter, 2017/04/27
- Re: We need an RFC procedure [Re: Services can now have a default value], ng0, 2017/04/23
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/04/22
- Re: Services can now have a default value, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/04/22