[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB EFI installation breakage
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB EFI installation breakage |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Aug 2017 22:00:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.25 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> To reconfigure my system on UEFI, I had to apply this patch:
>
> modified gnu/bootloader/grub.scm
> @@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ submenu \"GNU system, old configurations...\" {~%")
> ;; root partition.
> (setenv "GRUB_ENABLE_CRYPTODISK" "y")
> (unless (zero? (system* grub-install "--boot-directory" install-dir
> - "--efi-directory" efi-dir))
> + ;; "--efi-directory" efi-dir
> + ))
> (error "failed to install GRUB (EFI)")))))
>
>
> Before that ‘grub-install’ would fail because ‘efi-dir’ would actually
> be “/dev/sda”, which is what I have in the ‘device’ field of
> ‘grub-configuration’.
>
> Removing the “--efi-directory” solves the problem because ‘grub-install’
> automatically determines that the EFI directory is mounted at /boot/efi.
>
> I think 2941b347b664a3d3114de0ac95e28db78db66144 is bogus because it
> assumes that the second argument of the gexp’d lambda is ‘efi-dir’,
> where in fact it is the ‘device’ field of the bootloader config.
>
> So what is the preferred fix? Simply remove “--efi-directory” like I
> did above, and rename ‘efi-dir’ to ‘device’ to avoid the ambiguity?
> Thoughts?
Maybe we could rename "device" to something like "target" and update the
documentation to mention that "target" means the _mounted_ EFI System
Partition for grub-efi, but is typically a block device.
"device" was a no-op for grub-efi anyway since it autodiscovered
"/boot/efi", at least now we can choose a different location.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature