[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC final update
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC final update |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:03:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.1 |
Hi reepca,
thanks for your report and for your work!
> tl;dr - I did not achieve the goals I set out to achieve. That makes me
> sad. I plan on working on it more.
Sometimes projects are like that. They can get more confusing as you go
on and try to rebuild the execution model in your head, especially when
dealing with a language like C++. These things cannot always be
anticipated at the beginning. Like Ludo said, communicating early and
often can be a real time saver in situations like this.
On the plus side, you did manage to get a deeper understanding of the
daemon code than most of us who rarely venture onto the C++ side. Your
understanding of what has been implemented already and what still needs
work is very valuable in driving the project to completion in the
following months. I hope school won’t erode your internal model too
quickly. It would be great to see more progress for which you’ve
already laid the foundation.
Thank you!
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
- GSoC final update, Caleb Ristvedt, 2017/08/29
- Re: GSoC final update, Andy Wingo, 2017/08/29
- Re: GSoC final update, Efraim Flashner, 2017/08/29
- Re: GSoC final update, Leo Famulari, 2017/08/29
- Re: GSoC final update, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/08/30
- Re: GSoC final update,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: GSoC final update, Andreas Enge, 2017/08/30