Re: GSoC final update

[Ludovic Courtès]

Heya,

Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:

> I have a probably naïve question, since I did not follow the project closely:
> Instead of an all-or-nothing outcome, success or failure, merge or bit rot,
> would it be possible to set up an incremental update path?
> Use some of your scheme code to replace part of the C++ daemon?
> Maybe write a high-level scheme engine that shells out to C++ functions in
> the current daemon, that could gradually be replaced by chunks of your code?

I like this idea.  One of the first things reepca worked on was writing
a replacement for the ‘guix-register’ C++ program in Scheme, which also
provides the foundation for everything else on that branch.

I think we should be able to merge this bit independently of the rest,
as a first step.

It requires care, but that’s definitely something we should look into.

Thanks,
Ludo’.