[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Meltdown / Spectre
From: |
Katherine Cox-Buday |
Subject: |
Re: Meltdown / Spectre |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Jan 2018 14:13:30 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <address@hidden> writes:
> I think the real and thornier question for GuixSD
> is: if the recent CPU vulnerabilities require a
> microcode update to fully mitigate, then how do we
> square not recommending proprietary globs like
> this in official channels with giving users all
> knowledge required to decide for themselves?
Yes, this exactly.
It's a unique (hm, is it?) situation pitting the ideals of copyleft
against the welfare of users. If an opaque microcode is required to
successfully mitigate these bugs, what is the moral stance to take?
I don't have an answer and that's why I'm asking here :)
--
Katherine
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Chris Marusich, 2018/01/06
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2018/01/08
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Marius Bakke, 2018/01/08
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/08
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/08
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre,
Katherine Cox-Buday <=
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/09
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Leo Famulari, 2018/01/10
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2018/01/11
- Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2018/01/11
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Tobias Platen, 2018/01/10
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Leo Famulari, 2018/01/10
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Christopher Lemmer Webber, 2018/01/10
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Kei Kebreau, 2018/01/10
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Chris Marusich, 2018/01/15
Re: Meltdown / Spectre, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/01/17