[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?
From: |
Attila Lendvai |
Subject: |
Re: Guile debugger workgroup? |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Nov 2022 20:46:36 +0000 |
coming from common lisp (and SBCL in particular), i think the lowest hanging
fruit in the guile debugging experience is making sure that backtraces are not
cut short when printed.
i tried multiple ways to configure the printer to acquire more info, but it
didn't react to anything i tried:
(setenv "COLUMNS" "300")
(debug-set! width 160)
(debug-set! depth 1000)
this is regularly causing me frustration when all i need to make progress is in
the cut off part of the backtrace, and the code in question is in a part of the
codebase that i can't easily change to add some good old printf's.
which reminds me that a project-wide logging infrastructure would also greatly
elevate the guix debugging experience.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
If you never heal from what hurt you, you'll bleed on people who didn't cut you.
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, (continued)
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2022/11/26
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/11/28
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Attila Lendvai, 2022/11/28
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2022/11/28
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/11/29
- Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Attila Lendvai, 2022/11/29
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, zimoun, 2022/11/27
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?,
Attila Lendvai <=
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2022/11/27
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Joshua Branson, 2022/11/28
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/11/28
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Attila Lendvai, 2022/11/28
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/11/29
Re: Guile debugger workgroup? (was: Coding style: similarly-named variables), Csepp, 2022/11/28
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Jannneke Nieuwenhuizen, 2022/11/30