[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?
From: |
Attila Lendvai |
Subject: |
Re: Guile debugger workgroup? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:41:49 +0000 |
> The scenario you describe above should be possible above (there is a
> debugger that supports breakpoints and single stepping). Now, it may
> be, as you wrote, that inlining can lead breakpoints to never be hit, or
> that there are bugs in this area. These things should be fixed, I agree.
i'm sure there's a way to globally override the debug/optimization/inlining
level in guile to make sure the code compiles in a way that no breakpoints are
missed (and/or backtraces remain more intact, etc).
this should also be added to the documentation, especially in the guix context,
where it's very much not as trivial as to change a command line argument to
e.g. start the guix daemon, or shepherd, in a configuration that makes things
more debuggable.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave.”
— Frederick Douglass (1818–1895), a former slave.
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, zimoun, 2022/11/27
Re: Guile debugger workgroup?, Attila Lendvai, 2022/11/27