[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?
From: |
Giovanni Biscuolo |
Subject: |
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:05:28 +0200 |
Hi
MSavoritias <email@msavoritias.me> writes:
[...]
>> Not needing to register yet another account for one-off contributions
>> is an argument that kills all the forges, sadly :)
>>
> With Sourcehut you can contribute without an account.
Because they use an email based patch send/review workflow :-)
In other words: you can contribute to a SourceHut hosted project with
patches (or just with comments to patches) because everyone can send an
email to an email address provided by the project maintainer(s).
> There is also https://forgefed.org/ which is for federated forges using
> activitypub. So you can have one account for all forges that
> federate. :D
Interesting project, for now the supported (implementations) are:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
- Vervis is the reference implementation of ForgeFed. It serves as a demo
platform for testing the protocol and new features.
- Forgejo is implementing federation.
- Pagure has an unmaintained ForgeFed plugin.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
(via https://forgefed.org/)
Funny thing is that on the main Vervis instance
(https://vervis.peers.community/browse) they say: «NOTE: Federation is
disabled on this instance!»
Let's say this federation project is stil in early alpha... and probably
we will never see an implementation in GitHub: WDYT?!? :-O
Anyway, since the SourceHut patch management medium is email, it's
federated by default.
Happy hacking! Gio'
[...]
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, (continued)
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Wilko Meyer, 2023/08/25
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/08/26
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Attila Lendvai, 2023/08/27
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Saku Laesvuori, 2023/08/27
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/08/27
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/08/29
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?,
Giovanni Biscuolo <=
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/08/28
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2023/08/28
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/08/28
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2023/08/30
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/08/29
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/08/29
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2023/08/25
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Josselin Poiret, 2023/08/27
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Katherine Cox-Buday, 2023/08/25
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/08/23