guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#72314] claims Guix can make about reproducibility (was Re: [bug#723


From: Luis Felipe
Subject: [bug#72314] claims Guix can make about reproducibility (was Re: [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:47:44 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0

El 31/07/24 a las 6:26, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) escribió:
Luis Felipe <sirgazil@zoho.com> writes:
Could you, Luis, in a new version of the patch add an asterisk that
preserving likely will work but not always and we cannot guarantee this
yet?  Cc to others for opinions.
Sure. I'll wait for other's opinions to see how to rewrite that part.

When I presented the proposal, Simon had suggested changing that
particular part to "Get the same environment in the future"
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00137.html). Maybe
that would be enough?
I had read the thread; but somehow missed Simon’s comment...  Yes, if
that rewording makes Simon happy already, we can do that.

However, writing “in the future“ (or just removing the word 50 from “50
years later”) could lead to misconceptions.  There are concrete bugs
hindering near-term reproducibility for some packages (e.g. those using
mercurial) [1].

Soo ... add an ugly asterisk saying “*currently only guaranteed for most
packages“?

How about linking the asterisk to the blog post instead (https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2024/adventures-on-the-quest-for-long-term-reproducible-deployment/)?


Attachment: OpenPGP_0x0AB0D067012F08C3.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]