[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.
From: |
Luis Felipe |
Subject: |
[bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page. |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:44:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 |
El 30/07/24 a las 18:08, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) escribió:
A blocking issue, one of your slogans says: "Get the same environment 50
years later". Guix stood back from this claim so far, although it is
the goal and there is the attempt to preserve.
Glad you caught this before publishing.
Could you, Luis, in a new version of the patch add an asterisk that
preserving likely will work but not always and we cannot guarantee this
yet? Cc to others for opinions.
Sure. I'll wait for other's opinions to see how to rewrite that part.
When I presented the proposal, Simon had suggested changing that
particular part to "Get the same environment in the future"
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00137.html).
Maybe that would be enough?
To quote [1]:
*The vision* First of all, one clarification: Guix aims to support time
travel, but we’re talking of a time scale measured in years, not in
decades. We know all too well that this is already very ambitious—it’s
something that probably nobody except Nix and Guix are even trying. More
importantly, software deployment at the scale of decades calls for very
different, more radical techniques; it’s the work of archivists.
/End quote.
I thought it would possible, in theory, to travel waay back with Guix
plus archives like Software Heritage in a very distant future... Oh well :)
We could make the confusing claim that Guix helps you ship source code
needed for building, which Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli kind of does for GPL
license compliance reasons [2], but Guix provides a --sources option to
find the sources only for packages and not system images. Shipping
sources is possible, but not easy and not the goal. You have a hard
time testing and /etc/hosts blocking network access.
Cc to Simon, Timothy and Vagrant, who are involved with reproducible
builds, and Denis who asked [2] mentioned above.
Thanks again for your help, Florian :)
OpenPGP_0x0AB0D067012F08C3.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [bug#72314] [PATCH 2/2] website: Move screenshots style to the screenshots style sheet., (continued)
- [bug#72314] [PATCH 0/3] website: Redesign home page, sirgazil, 2024/07/29
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page., sirgazil, 2024/07/29
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 2/3] website: Move screenshots style to the screenshots style sheet., sirgazil, 2024/07/29
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 3/3] website: Home page template: Untabify., sirgazil, 2024/07/29
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page., pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/07/30
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page., Luis Felipe, 2024/07/30
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page., pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/07/30
- [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.,
Luis Felipe <=
- [bug#72314] claims Guix can make about reproducibility (was Re: [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.), pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/07/31
- [bug#72314] claims Guix can make about reproducibility (was Re: [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.), Luis Felipe, 2024/07/31
- [bug#72314] claims Guix can make about reproducibility (was Re: [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.), pelzflorian (Florian Pelz), 2024/07/31
- [bug#72314] claims Guix can make about reproducibility (was Re: [bug#72314] [PATCH v1 1/3] website: Redesign home page.), Luis Felipe, 2024/07/31
[bug#72314] [PATCH v2 1/3] website: Redesign home page., sirgazil, 2024/07/31