Re: All bash variables that can be used as temp variables?

[Roger]

> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 12:11:55PM -0600, Peng Yu wrote:
>I am not saying it should be turned into a full-feature programing
>language. But those full-fledged programming languages have many
>drawbacks that bash doesn't have. One key problem I don't like about
>those program languages (with the modules/packages on top) is that
>they change too frequently. So that if I program something on them,
>after a few years, I have to adapt my code to fit their changes. For
>bash, that is much less likely to happen. Part of the reason is that I
>made my own library in bash, as bash does not provide a library. In
>this sense, it is actually a good thing about a language that does not
>provide a library, this forces users to do something from scratch.

Yup.  Think quite a few long-timers think similar, but why edumacate those.

Roger

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature