[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About %destructor is c++ mode
From: |
Min Wang |
Subject: |
Re: About %destructor is c++ mode |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:38:03 -0400 |
Hi
just fyi, I just posted the issue in the bug-bison as well.
min
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Min Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
> HI
>
>>
>>
>> > My confusion is: it seems the %destructor is called even for the
>> normal parse!!
>>
>> It should not. But I rely on C++ cleanup, so somebody else will have to
>> tune in here.
>>
>>
>>
> I checked the generated code again:
>
>
> #line 1038 "filter_parser.cpp" // lalr1.cc:859
> YY_REDUCE_PRINT (yyn);
>
> try
>
> {
>
> switch (yyn)
>
> {
> ....
> default:
>
> break;
>
> }
>
> }
>
> catch (const syntax_error& yyexc)
>
> {
>
> error (yyexc);
>
> YYERROR;
>
> }
>
> YY_SYMBOL_PRINT ("-> $$ =", yylhs);
>
> yypop_ (yylen);
>
> yylen = 0;
>
> YY_STACK_PRINT ();
>
>
> the normal case will go to:
>
> yypop_ (yylen) which will call basic_symbol<Base>::clear () -> call
> %destructor code
>
>
> It seems a defect to me. should I forward to bug-bison?
>
>
>
> min
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
http://www.comrite.com
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, (continued)
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode,
Min Wang <=
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/18