[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About %destructor is c++ mode
From: |
Min Wang |
Subject: |
Re: About %destructor is c++ mode |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:57:50 -0400 |
HI
@Hans. thanks
I saw the comments in the code:
/* Variants are always initialized to an empty instance of the
correct type. The default '$$ = $1' action is NOT applied
when using variants. */
so seems we are ok.
min
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 19 Aug 2016, at 15:45, Min Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > so if every rule has an explicit action, the issue could be avoided,
> right?
>
> Only if the implementation of the C++ parser has been changed, but it may
> not. Check the output C++ source code.
>
>
>
--
http://www.comrite.com
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, (continued)
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode,
Min Wang <=
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/19
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Min Wang, 2016/08/18
- Re: About %destructor is c++ mode, Hans Åberg, 2016/08/18