[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No standard library compilation
From: |
ernesto |
Subject: |
Re: No standard library compilation |
Date: |
2 Jun 2006 22:48:33 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/0.2 |
Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> Why not?
Because I need a very small footprint, I will create my own set of
classes, templates, exceptions and I will not need the STL at all.
> > So, what basic methods should I implement in order to have full C++
> > features on my application without using the libstdc++?
>
> Whichever methods are reported as unresolved when you link with
> -nodefaultlibs.
Do you know if there is some documentation about that?
Best regards,
Ernesto