[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about :: sign and % sign problems
From: |
Paul D. Smith |
Subject: |
Re: about :: sign and % sign problems |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:56:00 -0400 |
%% John Graham-Cumming <address@hidden> writes:
>> Another question, ";" means do nothing, why sometimes we still add some
>> commands after ;? (I mean, if do nothing, we should not add any commands
>> after ";").
jg> No, ; doesn't mean do nothing. ; means after this semicolon are
jg> commands that should be executed for this rule. If there are no
jg> commands then there are no commands to execute.
Put another way, this:
foo: ; echo foo
is just another way to write this:
foo:
<TAB> echo foo
and so this:
foo: ;
is just another way to write this:
foo:
<TAB>
(an empty command)
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, John Graham-Cumming, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, John Graham-Cumming, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems,
Paul D. Smith <=
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Paul D. Smith, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Paul D. Smith, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/26
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Paul D. Smith, 2006/04/27
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/28
- Re: about :: sign and % sign problems, Lin George, 2006/04/26