[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Exact paths vs canonical paths
From: |
Angel Tsankov |
Subject: |
Re: Exact paths vs canonical paths |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:33:43 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
On 10/25/2010 01:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:18:39 +0300
From: Angel Tsankov<address@hidden>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gnu.make.general
CC: address@hidden
./a.out: a.o
@echo $@ # Prints a.out instead of ./a.out
[...]
So what is the difference between "a.out" and "./a.out" that makes you
need the latter?
I need ./a.out in a call to patsubst like this one:
$(PATH_TO_OBJECTS)/%.o: ...
# Get source file that corresponds to an object file
$(patsubst $(PATH_TO_OBJECTS)/%.o,$(PATH_TO_SOURCES)/%.c,$@))
The problem occurs when PATH_TO_OBJECTS starts with './', e.g.
'./objects' Then $@ returns just 'objects' and the call to patsubst fails.
Regards,
Angel Tsankov
Re: Exact paths vs canonical paths, Oleksandr Gavenko, 2010/10/25