Re: Merging rules

[Sébastien Hinderer]

Sébastien Hinderer (2018/06/14 14:27 +0200):
> Ah, it's too bad. Because, what I forgot to mention is that the intent
> behind all this is to make the recipe(s) a bit more complex by adding
> other variables, namely CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS, to let the user (the
> person who compiles the package) use them when desired.
> 
> I that light, and to guarantee that all the rules are consistent, do you
> think it would become worth defining a marco that takes as only argument
> the pattern of the target?

I meant "In that lignt".

Or perhaps, rather than putting the whole rule in a macro, I could
define as a macro just the recipe? Would that be better style?

Thanks again,

Sébastien.