[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify()
From: |
Simone Gabbriellini |
Subject: |
Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify() |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Oct 2010 19:21:18 +0200 |
Thanks Tamas, Gabor
actually, I should have the 1-based vertex indexing. BTW, the edge indexing is
0-based, right?
> V(g)
Vertex sequence:
[1] "user138" "user300" "user301" "user290" "user93" "user145" "user223"
"user96" "user148" "user154"
[11] "user152" "user467" "user104" "user317" "user111" "user143" "user292"
"user91" "user31" "user90"
> E(g)
Edge sequence:
[0] user85 -> user85
[1] user33 -> user33
best,
simone
Il giorno 21/ott/2010, alle ore 19.06, Tamas Nepusz ha scritto:
>> Definitely, because your code does not take into account that edges are
>> reindexed after every deletion. I'd go for delete.edges(g, seq(0,
>> ecount(g)-1)[is.loop(g)])
> Or, even better: delete.edges(g, which(is.loop(g))-1) if your igraph version
> uses 0-based indexing. Note that the R interface of igraph 0.6 has recently
> switched to 1-based indexing, so if you installed igraph 0.6 in the last few
> days, you don't have to subtract 1.
>
> --
> T.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> igraph-help mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
- [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Simone Gabbriellini, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Gábor Csárdi, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Simone Gabbriellini, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Tamas Nepusz, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Tamas Nepusz, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Gábor Csárdi, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(),
Simone Gabbriellini <=
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Gábor Csárdi, 2010/10/21
- Re: [igraph] a problem with simplify(), Simone Gabbriellini, 2010/10/21