[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?
From: |
Stephanie Seibt |
Subject: |
Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13? |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:44:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) |
Hi Mark,
Mark D. Baushke schrieb:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stephanie Seibt <address@hidden> writes:
here is my test case:
1) cvs update -j last_join_tag -j BRANCHNAME >logfile 2>&1
2) content of logfile:
RCS file: /cvs-repository/path_to_file/file,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.2.10.1
Merging differences between 1.2 and 1.2.10.1 into file
rcsmerge: warning: conflicts during merge
As I do not actually have your file,v available as a test case, this
does not help very much.
file revision 1.2
snip:
my @r = (q$Revision: 1.2 $ =~ /\d+/g);
file revision 1.2.10
snip:
my @r = (q$Revision: 1.2.10.1 $ =~ /\d+/g);
file after join:
<<<<<<< file
my @r = (q$Revision: 1.5 $ =~ /\d+/g);
=======
my @r = (q$Revision: 1.2.10.1 $ =~ /\d+/g);
1.2.10.1
3) content of CVS/Entries:
/file/1.5/Result of merge+Fri Jun 2 08:02:40 2006//
4) cvs -n update file shows nothing (is cvs-1.12.13 for Windows)
And is the contents of the CVS/Entries file unchanged after this
step #4 operation?
the content is unchanged
5) cvs-1.11.17 -n update shows (also Windows client)
C file
What dose 'cvs-1.12.13 version' output? (i.e., what is the the server
revision of CVS)? It would also be good to know the server hardware and
operating system type and any special configurations that went into the
server versio n of cvs.
Are you able to give me any further details about the configuration of
the cvs 1.12.13 you are using?
I thought I did it in my first mail
Environment:
remote server cvs-1.12.9 (Debian-patch, should be equal to cvs-1.12.13)
pserver access
client cvs-1.12.13 for Windows (downloaded from gnu.org)
output of cvs-1.12.13 version is
Client: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.12.13 (client)
Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.12.9 (client/server)
the server is Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
Hope this helps, Stephanie
Sadly, not yet. Until an unless I can understand what is happening, I am
not able to fix it.
-- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEf/UMCg7APGsDnFERAt6zAJ46fX+Jqrrpkz/iyeUHBCVp5LjCigCffM8q
IqPCv3BFVDlTQD1tIXwxIhQ=
=Tkhg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Greetings, Stephanie
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Stephanie Seibt, 2006/06/02
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?,
Stephanie Seibt <=
- Message not available
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/08
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/10
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07