[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?
From: |
Steve McIntyre |
Subject: |
Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 00:51:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:40:00AM -0700, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Are you able to give us a step-by-step reproducable test case?
>
>If you look in the CVS/Entries file does the entry for your conflicted
>file have something that looks like this line:
>
>/filename/1.30/Result of merge+Fri Jun 2 07:40:30 2006//
>
>before and after the final 'cvs update' ?
Doing similar here, I get
tack:/tmp$ grep /Seyon.c/ seyon1/CVS/Entries
/Seyon.c/1.36/Wed Jun 7 23:44:30 2006//
tack:/tmp$ cvs-1.12.13 -q up seyon1
RCS file: /home/cvs/seyon/Seyon.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
Merging differences between 1.36 and 1.37 into Seyon.c
rcsmerge: warning: conflicts during merge
cvs update: conflicts found in seyon1/Seyon.c
C seyon1/Seyon.c
tack:/tmp$ grep /Seyon.c/ seyon1/CVS/Entries
/Seyon.c/1.37/Result of merge+Wed Jun 7 23:50:00 2006//
tack:/tmp$ cvs-1.12.13 -q up seyon1
tack:/tmp$ grep /Seyon.c/ seyon1/CVS/Entries
/Seyon.c/1.37/Result of merge+Wed Jun 7 23:50:00 2006//
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. address@hidden
Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline,
Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to
concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud.
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/01
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Stephanie Seibt, 2006/06/02
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Stephanie Seibt, 2006/06/02
- Message not available
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?,
Steve McIntyre <=
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/07
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Jim Hyslop, 2006/06/08
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/10
- Re: Major change in conflict handling between 1.12.9 and 1.12.13?, Steve McIntyre, 2006/06/07