[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Koha-devel] Re: Re: non-simple publication years?
From: |
address@hidden via news-to-mail gateway |
Subject: |
[Koha-devel] Re: Re: non-simple publication years? |
Date: |
Tue Dec 10 06:24:02 2002 |
In article <address@hidden>,
Chris Cormack <address@hidden> wrote:
>These dates are just for bibliographic data right?
>IE you dont want to use "Chinese" format dates for issuing?
>Purely as bibliographical data?
For us, yes, purely as bibliographical data.
There is a chance that some of our friends in the ROC will
really want to use Republic dates for issuing, but I can't
speak for them :-/
--
Ambrose Li <address@hidden>
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/cmcc/ http://www.cccgt.org/
DRM is theft - We are the stakeholders