koha-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Koha-devel] Clarification of jargon & tidying up


From: Paul POULAIN
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Clarification of jargon & tidying up
Date: Tue Sep 21 01:00:03 2004
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804

Owen Leonard a écrit :

* what is "Biblio"?  A bibliographic record?
* What do "biblionumber" and "biblioitemnumber" refer to?
Biblionumber refers to the unique identification number of a record in the biblio table in the database. This table contains the most 'general' information about a particular title: title, author. biblioitemnumber *might* refer to the id number of a record in the biblioitems table, which contains the next level of information: isbn, publication year, number of pages. It *could* also refer to 'biblio item number,' which would refer to the id of a record in the items table-- where the last level of detail is kept, with barcode number, branch code, etc. It can be very confusing!
Some history here :
Katipo & HLT, when developping the 1st version of Koha defined 3 level for a given "book".
The biblio, the biblioitem, the item.
* The biblio : it's what is unmovable. Like the title & the author. For example "les fleurs du mal" from "Baudelaire" * The bibliotem : it's what changes on various edition. For example "Edition 1960, in 20x10cm size" and "edition 1980, in pocket size". * The item : it's what refers to the "real" item you have. For example, you have 2 items for the biblio "les fleurs du mal, edition 1960, 20x10cm" : one acquired in 1990, page 10 missing, barcode 1234, and one acquired in 2001, barcode 4321.

HOWEVER : in MARC, the 3 level DOES NOT EXIST. There are only 2 : the biblio level and the item level. So, in 2.0 and later versions, biblio & biblioitems ARE MERGED. There is a 1-1 relation between both. In fact the biblioitems table could disappear, but nobody taked care of this until then.
(look at DB schema, DL from www.koha.org/wiki)

A slightly more labor intensive change would be to use more CSS for layout in the future versions
There are CSS-based templates for OPAC. I'm not sure about intranet.
The NPL intranet templates for version 2.0 are CSS-based. There are also new CSS-based templates for the latest pre- release version, developed by Paul and replacing the current default templates.
Right for OPAC.
In intranet, the "default" templates in the 2.2 version will be 90% css based. Only a few silly html code will remain.
It's simple CSS however.

--
Paul POULAIN
Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres
responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]