[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Koha-devel] Clarification of jargon & tidying up
From: |
Paul POULAIN |
Subject: |
Re: [Koha-devel] Clarification of jargon & tidying up |
Date: |
Tue Sep 21 01:00:03 2004 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 |
Owen Leonard a écrit :
* what is "Biblio"? A bibliographic record?
* What do "biblionumber" and "biblioitemnumber" refer
to?
Biblionumber refers to the unique identification number of a
record in the biblio table in the database. This table
contains the most 'general' information about a particular
title: title, author. biblioitemnumber *might* refer to the
id number of a record in the biblioitems table, which contains
the next level of information: isbn, publication year, number
of pages. It *could* also refer to 'biblio item number,'
which would refer to the id of a record in the items table--
where the last level of detail is kept, with barcode number,
branch code, etc. It can be very confusing!
Some history here :
Katipo & HLT, when developping the 1st version of Koha defined 3 level
for a given "book".
The biblio, the biblioitem, the item.
* The biblio : it's what is unmovable. Like the title & the author. For
example "les fleurs du mal" from "Baudelaire"
* The bibliotem : it's what changes on various edition. For example
"Edition 1960, in 20x10cm size" and "edition 1980, in pocket size".
* The item : it's what refers to the "real" item you have. For example,
you have 2 items for the biblio "les fleurs du mal, edition 1960,
20x10cm" : one acquired in 1990, page 10 missing, barcode 1234, and one
acquired in 2001, barcode 4321.
HOWEVER : in MARC, the 3 level DOES NOT EXIST. There are only 2 : the
biblio level and the item level.
So, in 2.0 and later versions, biblio & biblioitems ARE MERGED. There is
a 1-1 relation between both. In fact the biblioitems table could
disappear, but nobody taked care of this until then.
(look at DB schema, DL from www.koha.org/wiki)
A slightly more labor intensive change would be to use
more CSS for layout in the future versions
There are CSS-based templates for OPAC. I'm not sure about
intranet.
The NPL intranet templates for version 2.0 are CSS-based.
There are also new CSS-based templates for the latest pre-
release version, developed by Paul and replacing the current
default templates.
Right for OPAC.
In intranet, the "default" templates in the 2.2 version will be 90% css
based. Only a few silly html code will remain.
It's simple CSS however.
--
Paul POULAIN
Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres
responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)