[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?
From: |
Anthony Youngman |
Subject: |
RE: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch? |
Date: |
Thu Sep 23 08:08:31 2004 |
Not that I'm aware of ...
What it is, is that Koha is getting bigger, and CVS doesn't scale ...
just look at linux and bitkeeper.
Arch means basically that any developer can maintain their own tree,
without worrying about treading on any body else's toes. With CVS you
always have the worry that either you are going to be unable to work
because somebody else has checked out the module you want, or somebody
checks in a module and blows away someone else's work because they both
had the same module checked out at the same time ... okay CVS is meant
to prevent the latter, but that only works when you have a PHB handing
out tasks ...
CVS is excellent for a tightly managed project - in other words NOT a
big distributed FLOSS project. Arch, bitkeeper, ?subversion? et al are
designed to handle distributed development.
And at the end of the day, even with CVS, don't you need a single
director in order to prevent anarchy? :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Owen
Leonard
Sent: 23 September 2004 15:49
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?
> > So does this mean that I can't merge back into the main
> > branch ... that you
> > have do do that? In CVS anyone with devel privs could
> > commit to the main repo ... or am I mising something?
>
> Either the RM or their automaton will need to do the merge.
> This is a deliberate model change from CVS which both allows
> more people to do more development tasks without waiting for
> approval, and allows the RM to say "show me the code" before
> accepting it into the final release tree, if they want.
It sounds like this is quite a shift of power, if I understand
correctly, from a group of trusted developers to a single
director who chooses what goes in and what doesn't. Do I
understand correctly?
Have we had problems in the past that will be alleviated by
this shift of power?
-- Owen
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Koha-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/koha-devel
****************************************************************************
This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain
private and confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must
not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it,
disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to
inform us of the transmission error or telephone ECA International immediately
and delete the e-mail from your information system.
Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 8272 5300,
Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582
2333.
****************************************************************************
- [Koha-devel] Koha docs in XML?, (continued)
Re: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?, Owen Leonard, 2004/09/23
Re: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?, Owen Leonard, 2004/09/23
RE: [Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?,
Anthony Youngman <=