[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge
|
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
|
Subject: |
Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:38:54 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 |
> When hacking it, I will keep
> in mind that it also needs to run on both mach and L4. :)
Mark's goal was never to target just the Hurd. In fact, he was
interested in creating an implementation that would run on Linux, the
Hurd or any other operating system that glibc supported.
The reason that the linux threads implementation is not used is that:
firstly it is Linux specific and secondly the FSF does not have the
copyright on the work.
Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge, Ian Duggan, 2001/10/22
Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge, Farid Hajji, 2001/10/22
Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge, Niels Möller, 2001/10/22
- Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge, Ian Duggan, 2001/10/22
- Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge, Farid Hajji, 2001/10/22
- Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge, Jeroen Dekkers, 2001/10/22
- pthreads (Re: L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Ian Duggan, 2001/10/22
- Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Ian Duggan, 2001/10/22
- Re: Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Jeroen Dekkers, 2001/10/23
- Re: Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Ian Duggan, 2001/10/23
- Re: Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Farid Hajji, 2001/10/23
- Re: Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Ed Page, 2001/10/24
Re: Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Niels Möller, 2001/10/24
Re: Why savannah? (was L4Hurd at Sourceforge), Jeroen Dekkers, 2001/10/24