[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Task destruction
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: Task destruction |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 16:38:10 -0400 (EDT) |
> I had started to consider this problem, however, had not gotten very
> far. This approach does make a lot of sense. The only open issue
> then is how to determine who the privileged server. Do you have any
> ideas? Should this just be some parameter? The first to register as
> such? Or perhaps, you had something else in mind.
I had only really thought about it in the Mach context, where privilege
means the host-priv port. I don't know enough about the bootstrapping and
privilege plans in L4.
- Re: Task destruction, (continued)
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/06
Re: Task destruction, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/05