[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Task destruction
From: |
Wolfgang Jährling |
Subject: |
Re: Task destruction |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:08:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.0.1i |
Niels Möller <address@hidden> wrote:
> I just meant that messages are sent in both directions: death
> notifications are sent by the task server to proc, and kill requests
> are sent from proc to the task server.
Ah, thanks.
> Will all handles be used in this way?
Not really. An RPC usually involves an IPC from the user to the server
and another IPC from the server to the user, and in both cases it will
be checked by the receiver if the sender actually is associated with the
object handle.
In the case of task death notification, it should be enough to do one
IPC. But for a kill request, I'm not sure. But this is an
implementation detail anyway.
Cheers,
GNU/Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Jährling <address@hidden> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/
Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/
The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-guide/
["We're way ahead of you here. The Hurd has always been on the ]
[ cutting edge of not being good for anything." -- Roland McGrath ]
- Re: Task destruction, (continued)
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/07
- Re: Task destruction, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/08/07
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/07
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction,
Wolfgang Jährling <=
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/05
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Niels Möller, 2002/08/06
- Re: Task destruction, Wolfgang Jährling, 2002/08/06
Re: Task destruction, Roland McGrath, 2002/08/05