[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?
|
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
|
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:20:12 -0400 |
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 17:37 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Pids are also broken for another reason: they are public entries in
> a globally shared, mutable namespace.
>
> If and only if one considers globally shared mutable namespaces
> broken. People with a lispish background don't.
Perhaps you have not read Jonathan Ree's work on a lisp-based security
kernel. This was one of the foundational problems that needed to be
solved.
shap
- Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/26
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/26
- Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Message not available
- Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Brian Brunswick, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/28
- Re: Name spaces in programming languages, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/28
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/27
- Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/27
Re: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27