[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About social balances
From: |
Benno |
Subject: |
Re: About social balances |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:06:35 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon Nov 07, 2005 at 17:30:10 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> I don't believe in "droits moraux". I have no objection to the idea
> that there might exist some right of an author that is separate
> from copyright, but the idea that this right is not transferable
> seems like a mistake.
>
>I have mixed feelings about droits moraux, since it might be possible
>to abuse it. The author is e.g. allowed to restrict any further
>reproduction of the work, and is allowed to prevent any kind of
>modification to the work. This make sense for paintings I guess, but
>doesn't make much sense for other creative works like software, and
>written works.
It is unclear, at least in Australian law, wether software is covered
by moral rights. I'm not sure if it is counted as an artistic work.
Benno
- Re: About social balances, (continued)
- Re: About social balances, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
Droits moraux, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
DRM vs. Privacy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07