[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About social balances
From: |
Benno |
Subject: |
Re: About social balances |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:24:19 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon Nov 07, 2005 at 18:04:57 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>Then what Australian law has isn't anything close to dorit moraux.
>Which goes a longer way than simple attribution.
Perhaps I wasn't clear in my expression earlier, as you have misunderstood
me. Australian law provides 3 specifics rights:
1/ Right to attribution.
2/ Right to not have work mis-attributed.
3/ Right to prevent others from interfering with the integrity of the work.
Hopefully that is clearer.
Cheers,
Benno
- About social balances, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances,
Benno <=
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
Droits moraux, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
DRM vs. Privacy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07