[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Bas Wijnen |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:41:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:02:36PM +0100, ness wrote:
> >The problem is that I call a file system server and ask for a list of
> >files, and I never get a reply because a file name is too long.
> >
> >I still think this can be fixed by limiting the name to some
> >client-specified size though. I just realised that the client should also
> >communicate this size to the server, so it doesn't attempt to transfer more
> >(taking more time than needed).
>
> The problem Jonathan pointed out is that *others* will delay. This is not
> the case, as the server will be multithreaded.
Multi-threaded, or handling data in chunks with an event-loop, like the Glib
main loop that Gtk uses.
Jonathan, would that solve the problems you are talking about? I don't see
any others...
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: On PATH_MAX, (continued)
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
- Message not available
- On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Bas Wijnen <=
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10