[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:49:03 -0500 |
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:22 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > So yes, I think we can dramatically increase the magnitude of the
> > problem with just about any form of concurrency you care to try. We can
> > convert a program that was not real time into a program that is both not
> > real time and now is subject to storage denial of resource too!
>
> Such state is indeed needed in this case. But it can be stored on
> client-supplied memory. What is needed is that the state is copied into a
> static server buffer when starting to handle the request, and copying it back
> when the request is delayed again. At those two moment do we need to accept
> page faults, because the client can misbehave or be destroyed. For the rest,
> I think everything should be normal.
Bas:
You build yours, and I will build mine. Mine will be in production two
years before yours is debugged enough to ship, and yours will *never* be
bug free.
shap
- On PATH_MAX, (continued)
- Message not available
- On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10