[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:35:33 -0500 |
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 20:00 +0100, ness wrote:
> > The client cannot grant a guarantee that the client does not have. The
> > client's schedule is revocable, therefore any schedule that it might
> > grant is revocable.
>
> Why should a given schedule be revokable?
If you cannot revoke schedule, how do you correct an erroneously issued
schedule?
> > Also, do you have any idea how complicated this would be to actually
> > implement? Or to use?
>
> Well, I not really. I imagine it extremely complicated. Currently this
> only a thought experiment for me.
Fair enough.
- Re: On PATH_MAX, (continued)
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08