[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:12:26 -0500 |
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 21:01 +0100, ness wrote:
> Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 20:00 +0100, ness wrote:
> >
> >>>The client cannot grant a guarantee that the client does not have. The
> >>>client's schedule is revocable, therefore any schedule that it might
> >>>grant is revocable.
> >>
> >>Why should a given schedule be revokable?
> >
> >
> > If you cannot revoke schedule, how do you correct an erroneously issued
> > schedule?
> >
>
> I'm not an expert and I have not yet read anything about reservation
> based scheduling, but let me raise the question: why should a schedule
> be issued erroneously?
Because I type "1ms in 50ms" when I meant "2ms in 100ms", or because I
start a program with a schedule and later realize that I do not want it
to run.
- Re: On PATH_MAX, (continued)
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08